Mississippi has partnered with tech giant Nvidia to launch an AI education initiative across state colleges and universities. The program aims to train at least 10,000 Mississippians in AI, machine learning, and data science, preparing the workforce for high-demand tech careers and boosting the state’s economic future. Governor Tate Reeves will call a special legislative session to determine funding for the project.

Congress faces mounting backlash over a proposed decade-long ban on state AI regulation, embedded in a sweeping budget bill. Some argue the pause is necessary to preserve American competitiveness by preventing a disorganized patchwork of state laws. However, lawmakers, advocacy groups, and state officials warn the moratorium would strip states of consumer protections, leaving AI oversight solely to Congress, despite its track record of legislative gridlock and Big Tech lobbying.

The European Commission has launched a six-week public consultation on implementing rules for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Amid the discussions are debates over compliance burdens, requests from American tech giants to simplify the code, worries over European innovation competitiveness, and expert concerns about transparency and downstream obligations for high-risk AI applications.

Tech and music leaders urged Congress to pass the No Fakes Act, a bipartisan bill protecting Americans from AI-generated deepfakes that steal voices and likenesses. The proposed law would build upon the Take It Down Act, creating federal safeguards, holding platforms accountable, and empowering victims to remove unauthorized digital replicas quickly, addressing urgent privacy and creative rights concerns.

In February of 2024, a teenager shot himself after months of conversation with a chatbot whose last message asked him to “come home to me as soon as possible.” A federal judge has just rejected AI firm Character.AI’s claim that its chatbot’s outputs are protected free speech, allowing a wrongful death lawsuit to proceed. The case will likely set a major precedent for AI liability and regulation as technology outpaces legal safeguards.

The Chicago Sun-Times and Philadelphia Inquirer syndicated a 50-page AI-generated "summer guide" filled with fake books, dubious tips, and non-existent individuals, exposing systemic editorial failures. The freelancer behind “Heat Index” admitted using unchecked AI content from King Features, highlighting journalism's crisis as financial strains and AI "slop" erode trust in legacy media. While a benign slip-up, this incident indicates the problematic AI future we could be heading towards.

As AI integration accelerates, state attorneys general leverage existing privacy, consumer protection, and anti-discrimination laws to address AI risks like deepfakes, bias, and fraud. California, Massachusetts, Oregon, New Jersey, and Texas lead enforcement, signaling heightened scrutiny for businesses deploying AI systems without robust compliance safeguards.

The viral “AI Barbie” trend, where users create Barbie-themed AI images, raises thorny legal issues from copyright and trademark infringement to data privacy and regulatory uncertainty. As generative AI collides with pop culture, creators and developers must navigate a shifting legal landscape to avoid infringing on intellectual property and exposing themselves and others to cybersecurity risks.

Legal experts and judges agree that AI can help process information and streamline judicial tasks, but it lacks the reasoning, empathy, and moral judgment needed for true adjudication. While courts experiment with AI in administrative roles, the consensus is that human judges remain essential, at least for now.